河南安阳“殷墟考古小镇”复原殷商盛景******
图为殷墟考古文旅小镇。 安阳市委宣传部供图
中新网安阳12月28日电 (阚力)位于河南安阳的殷墟考古文旅小镇，将复原新发现的殷墟大型道路，增设铜车马、行人、游商等雕塑，真实反映殷商时期的市井繁荣景象。
殷墟考古文旅小镇是殷墟国家考古遗址公园配套服务项目，占地总面积约250亩，一期占地面积约110亩，建设内容包括考古科学馆、纱厂厂史馆、图书艺术中心、实景演艺《殷墟遗梦》、元宇宙数字化街区等，部分街区已于11月份对外开放；二期占地面积约140亩，主要围绕考古研学、考古培训、考古主题酒店进行设计，计划2023年启动建设，2024年全面完成。
那么，考古文旅小镇展示了哪些考古元素？有哪些亮点项目？
安阳市文旅集团董事长李友成27日在举行的甲骨文研究与传承工作新闻发布会上介绍，复原新发现的殷墟大型道路是亮点之一。
图为殷墟考古文旅小镇。 安阳市委宣传部供图
近期，考古人员在小镇内新发现一条大型东西向道路，长达80米，为进一步研究商代都城的聚落结构提供了突破口。“下一步我们拟进行道路情景复原。”李友成说。
考古科学馆亦是亮点项目之一。李友成表示，该馆定位为考古科普馆，集中展示中国现代考古百年所取得的重大成就，运用多媒体高科技手法，让游客沉浸式地体验考古挖掘过程、还原考古遗迹、进行考古研学和DIY创作等，成为集文化展示、考古博览、科教研学为一体的考古中心及研学基地。
今年6月，相州窑复烧暨城市展厅项目作为亮点之一，落户殷墟考古文旅小镇，开展复烧和活态化研学实践，充分展示相州窑文化保护传承及活化利用成果。
据悉，相州窑是一座在安阳发现的隋代瓷窑址，奠定了中国瓷器“南青北白”的格局。
李友成介绍，小镇还打造了首个以殷商文化为主题的演艺剧目《殷墟遗梦》。该剧以商王武丁，王后妇好的传奇爱情故事为背景，充分挖掘商朝的服饰文化、婚俗礼仪、祭祀占卜、军事战争、商代乐舞、河南非遗等，借助裸眼3D、5G、雾森等技术，让剧情更加生动逼真。
李友成介绍，小镇还将作为安阳(殷墟元宇宙)的总部基地，结合后期工程，完成虚拟现实影院、殷墟XR商朝会的重大项目立项。高质量开发代表殷商文化的“安安”和“阳阳”数字人物IP，并进行数字人AI长期训练，使之成为安阳首个“文化旅游数字向导”。
图为殷墟考古文旅小镇。 安阳市委宣传部供图
此外，小镇还积极营造考古元素文化氛围，将街区内的窨井盖、灯柱、线杆等户外设施，融入甲骨文、青铜器设计理念。
李友成表示，近期在小镇内建成试用的甲骨文书屋，陈列了大量殷商文化书籍，书屋还定期举办甲骨文研讨会、读书会等活动，唤起文化记忆。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
| 至尊彩票地图 |
